20-Apr-2022 - Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Open sharing of biotechnology research – transparency versus security

Researchers outline how to balance the open sharing of biotech research with transparency and security

As biotechnology advances, the risk of accidental or deliberate misuse of biological research like viral engineering is increasing. At the same time, “open science” practices like the public sharing of research data and protocols are becoming widespread. An article publishing April 14th in the open access journal PLOS Biology by James Smith and Jonas Sandbrink at the University of Oxford, UK, examines how open science practices and the risks of misuse interface and proposes solutions to the problems identified.

The authors grapple with a critically important issue that emerged with the advent of nuclear physics: how the scientific community should react when two values – security and transparency – are in conflict. They argue that in the context of viral engineering, open code, data, and materials may increase the risk of the release of enhanced pathogens. Openly available machine learning models could reduce the amount of time needed in the laboratory and make pathogen engineering easier.

To mitigate such catastrophic misuse, mechanisms that ensure responsible access to relevant dangerous research materials need to be explored. In particular, to prevent the misuse of computational tools, controlling access to software and data may be necessary.

Preprints, which have become widely used during the pandemic, make preventing the spread of risky information at the publication stage difficult. In response, the authors argue that oversight needs to take place earlier in the research lifecycle. Lastly, Smith and Sandbrink highlight that research preregistration, a practice promoted by the open science community to increase research quality, may harbor an opportunity to review and mitigate research risks.

“In the face of increasingly accessible methods for the creation of possible pandemic pathogens, the scientific community needs to take steps to mitigate catastrophic misuse,” say Smith and Sandbrink. “Risk mitigation measures need to be fused into practices developed to ensure open, high-quality, and reproducible scientific research. To make progress on this important issue, open science and biosecurity experts need to work together to develop mechanisms to ensure responsible research with maximal societal benefit.”

The authors propose several of those mechanisms, and hope that the research will spur innovation in this critically important yet critically neglected area. They show that science cannot be just open or closed: there are intermediate states that need to be explored, and difficult trade-offs touching on core scientific values may be needed. “In contrast to the strong narrative towards open science that has emerged in recent years, maximizing societal benefit of scientific work may sometimes mean preventing, rather than encouraging, its spread,” they conclude.

Facts, background information, dossiers
  • scientific research
  • publishing
  • biosecurity
More about Public Library of Science
More about University of Oxford
  • News

    Dairy products linked to increased risk of cancer

    The first major study to investigate dairy consumption and cancer risk in Chinese adults found that greater intake was associated with higher risks of liver cancer and female breast cancer. Overall evidence to date on whether eating dairy products affects the risk of cancer has been inconsi ... more

    Low-meat and meat-free diets associated with lower overall cancer risk

    Eating meat five times or less per week is associated with a lower overall cancer risk, according to a study published in the open access journal BMC Medicine. Cody Watling and colleagues from the University of Oxford, UK investigated the relationship between diet and cancer risk by analysi ... more

    Eppendorf Award for Young European Investigators 2021 goes to Tanmay Bharat

    In 2021, Eppendorf AG, the Hamburg life sciences company, is presenting its research prize for the 26th time. The independent Eppendorf Award Jury chaired by Prof. Reinhard Jahn announced Dr. Tanmay Bharat, Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom as the wi ... more

  • Videos

    Using VR to untangle genes

    Researchers from Oxford have been using VR to look at interactive models of genes. The simulations use data combined from genome sequencing, data on the interactions of DNA and microscopy data. It lets you see which parts of the genome sit interact with each other in physical space. regions ... more

More about PLoS Biology