My watch list  


Classification & external resources
ICD-10 O11., O13., [[ICD-10 Chapter |]]14.
ICD-9 642.4-642.7
MedlinePlus 000898
eMedicine med/1905  ped/1885

Pre-eclampsia (US: preeclampsia) is a medical condition where hypertension arises in pregnancy (pregnancy-induced hypertension) in association with significant amounts of protein in the urine. Because pre-eclampsia refers to a set of symptoms rather than any causative factor, it is established that there can be many different causes for the syndrome. It also appears likely that there is a substance or substances from the placenta that may cause endothelial dysfunction in the maternal blood vessels of susceptible women.[1] While blood pressure elevation is the most visible sign of the disease, it involves generalized damage to the maternal endothelium and kidneys and liver, with the release of vasopressive factors only secondary to the original damage.

Pre-eclampsia may develop from 20 weeks gestation (it is considered early onset before 32 weeks, which is associated with increased morbidity) and its progress differs among patients; most cases are diagnosed pre-term. Apart from abortion, caesarian section, or induction of labor, and therefore delivery of the placenta, there is no known cure. It may also occur up to six weeks post-partum. It is the most common of the dangerous pregnancy complications; it may affect both the mother and the fetus.[1]



Pre-eclampsia is diagnosed when a pregnant woman develops high blood pressure (two separate readings taken at least 6 hours apart of 140/90 or more) and 300 mg of protein in a 24-hour urine sample (proteinuria). A rise in baseline BP of 20 systolic or 15 diastolic, while not meeting the absolute criteria of 140/90 is still considered important to note but no longer diagnostic. Swelling, or edema, (especially in the hands and face) was originally considered an important sign for a diagnosis of pre-eclampsia, but in current medical practice only hypertension and proteinuria are necessary for a diagnosis. However, pitting edema (unusual swelling, particularly of the hands, feet, or face, notable by leaving an indentation when pressed on) can be significant and should be reported to your health-care provider.

Although eclampsia is potentially fatal, pre-eclampsia is often asymptomatic, hence its detection depends on signs or investigations. Nonetheless, one symptom is crucially important because it is so often misinterpreted. The epigastric pain, which reflects hepatic involvement and is typical of the HELLP syndrome, may easily be confused with heartburn, a very common problem of pregnancy. However, it is not burning in quality, does not spread upwards towards the throat, is associated with hepatic tenderness, may radiate through to the back, and is not relieved by giving antacids. It is often very severe, described by sufferers as the worst pain that they have ever experienced. Affected women are not uncommonly referred to general surgeons as suffering from an acute abdomen, for example acute cholecystitis.

In general, none of the signs of pre-eclampsia is specific; even convulsions in pregnancy are more likely to have causes other than eclampsia in modern practice. Diagnosis, therefore, depends on finding a coincidence of several pre-eclamptic features, the final proof being their regression after delivery.

Some women develop high blood pressure without the proteinuria (protein in urine); this is called Pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) or gestational hypertension. Both pre-eclampsia and PIH are regarded as very serious conditions and require careful monitoring of mother and baby.


Pre-eclampsia occurs in as many as 10% of pregnancies, usually in the second or third trimester, and after the 32nd week. Some women will experience pre-eclampsia as early as 20 weeks, though this is rare. It is much more common in women who are pregnant for the first time[2], and its frequency drops significantly in second pregnancies. While change of paternity in a subsequent pregnancy is now thought to lower risk except in those with a family history of hypertensive pregnancy,[3] since increasing maternal age raises risk[4] it has been difficult to evaluate how significant paternity change actually is and studies are providing conflicting data on this point.

Pre-eclampsia is also more common in women who have preexisting hypertension, diabetes, autoimmune diseases like lupus, various inherited thrombophilias like Factor V Leiden, or renal disease, in women with a family history of pre-eclampsia, obese women, and in women with a multiple gestation (twins, triplets, and more). The single most significant risk for developing pre-eclampsia is having had pre-eclampsia in a previous pregnancy.

Pre-eclampsia may also occur in the immediate post-partum period or up to 6-8 weeks post-partum. This is referred to as "postpartum pre-eclampsia." The most dangerous time for the mother is the 24-48 hours postpartum and careful attention should be paid to pre-eclampsia signs and symptoms.[citation needed]


The pre-eclampsia syndrome is thought in some cases to be caused by a shallowly implanted placenta which becomes hypoxic, leading to an immune reaction characterized by secretion of upregulated inflammatory mediators from the placenta, and acting on the vascular endothelium. The shallow implantation is thought to stem from the maternal immune system's response to the placenta. This theory emphasizes the role of the maternal immune system, and refers to evidence suggesting a lack of established immunological tolerance to paternal antigens from the fetus and its placenta.[5] In some cases of pre-eclampsia it is thought that the mother lacks the receptors for the proteins the placenta is using to downregulate the maternal immune system's response to it.[6] This view is also consistent with evidence showing many miscarriages to be an immunological disorder where the mother's immune system "unleashes a destructive attack on the tissues of the developing fetus." [7]

In many cases of the pre-eclampsia syndrome, however, the maternal response to the placenta appears to have allowed for normal implantation. It is possible that women with higher baseline levels of inflammation stemming from underlying conditions such as chronic hypertension or autoimmune disease may have less tolerance for the inflammatory burden of pregnancy.

If severe, preeclampsia progresses to fulminant pre-eclampsia, with headaches, visual disturbances, and epigastric pain, and further to HELLP syndrome and eclampsia. Placental abruption is associated with hypertensive pregnancies. These are life-threatening conditions for both the developing baby and the mother.

Many theories have attempted to explain why preeclampsia arises, and have linked the syndrome to the presence of the following:

  • endothelial cell injury
  • immune rejection of the placenta
  • compromised placental perfusion
  • altered vascular reactivity
  • imbalance between prostacyclin and thromboxane
  • decreased glomerular filtration rate with retention of salt and water
  • decreased intravascular volume
  • increased central nervous system irritability
  • disseminated intravascular coagulation
  • uterine muscle stretch (ischemia)
  • dietary factors, including vitamin deficiency
  • genetic factors[8]

The current understanding of the syndrome is as a two-stage process, with a highly variable first stage which predisposes the placenta to hypoxia, followed by the release of soluble factors which result in many of the other observed phenomena. Many of the older theories can be subsumed under this umbrella, as the soluble factors have been shown to cause, for example, endothelial cell injury, altered vascular reactivity, the classic lesion of glomerular endotheliosis, decreased intravascular volume, inflammation, etc. Underlying maternal susceptibility to the damage is likely implicated as well.


Although much research into the etiology and mechanism of pre-eclampsia has taken place, its exact pathogenesis remains uncertain. Some studies support notions of inadequate blood supply to the placenta making it release particular hormones or chemical agents that, in mothers predisposed to the condition, leads to damage of the endothelium (lining of blood vessels), alterations in metabolism, inflammation, and other possible reactions.[1]

Some studies suggest that hypoxia resulting from inadequate perfusion upregulates sFlt-1, a VEGF and PlGF antagonist, leading to a damaged maternal endothelium and restriction of placental growth.[9] In addition, endoglin, a TGF-beta antagonist, is elevated in pregnant women who develop preeclampsia.[10] Soluble endoglin is likely upregulated by the placenta in response to an upregulation of cell-surface endoglin produced by the maternal immune system, although there is also the potential that sEng is produced by the maternal endothelium. Levels of both sFlt-1 and sEng increase as severity of disease increases, with levels of sEng surpassing levels of sFlt-1 in HELLP syndrome cases.

Both sFlt-1 and sEng are upregulated in all pregnant women to some extent, supporting the idea that hypertensive disease in pregnancy is a normal pregnancy adaptation gone awry. As natural killer cells are intimately involved in placentation and as placentation involves a degree of maternal tolerance for a foreign placenta which requires maternal resources for its support, it is not surprising that the maternal immune system might respond more negatively to the arrival of some placentae under certain circumstances, such as a placenta which is more invasive than normal. Initial maternal rejection of the placental cytotrophoblasts may be the cause of the inadequately remodeled spiral arteries in those cases of preeclampsia associated with shallow implantation, leading to downstream hypoxia and the appearance of maternal symptoms in response to upregulated sFlt-1 and sEng. (See parent-offspring conflict.)

It has been documented that fetal cells such as fetal erythroblasts as well as cell-free fetal DNA are increased in the maternal circulation in women who develop preeclampsia. These findings have given rise to the hypothesis that preeclampsia is a disease process by which a placental lesion such as hypoxia allows increased fetal material into maternal circulation that leads to an immune response and endothelial damage ultimately resulting in preeclampsia and eclampsia.

Differential diagnosis

Preeclampsia-eclampsia can mimic and be confused with many other diseases, including chronic hypertension, chronic renal disease, primary seizure disorders, gallbladder and pancreatic disease, immune or thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, and hemolytic-uremic syndrome. It must always be considered a possibility in any pregnant woman beyond 20 weeks of gestation. It is particularly difficult to diagnose when preexisting disease such as hypertension is present.[11]


Eclampsia can occur after the onset of pre-eclampsia. Eclampsia, which is a more serious condition, complicates 1 in 2000 maternities in the United Kingdom and carries a maternal mortality of 1.8 per cent.[12] The HELLP syndrome is more common, probably about 1 in 500 maternities, but may be as dangerous as eclampsia itself. These two major maternal crises can present unheralded by prodromal signs of pre-eclampsia.

Cerebral hemorrhage is a lesion that can kill women with pre-eclampsia or eclampsia. In that cerebral haemorrhage is a known complication of severe hypertension in other contexts, it must be assumed that this is a major predisposing factor in this situation, although this has not been proved. Adult respiratory distress syndrome appears to have become more common, it is not known whether this is a consequence of modern methods of respiratory support rather than of the disease itself.

Treatment and Prevention

The only known treatments for eclampsia or advancing pre-eclampsia are abortion or delivery, either by induction or Caesarean section. However, post-partum pre-eclampsia may occur up to 6 weeks following delivery even if symptoms were not present during the pregnancy. Post-partum pre-eclampsia is dangerous to the health of the mother since she may ignore or dismiss symptoms as simple post-delivery headaches and edema. Hypertension can sometimes be controlled with anti-hypertensive medication, but any effect this might have on the progress of the underlying disease is unknown.

Many studies have also suggested the importance of a woman's immunological tolerance to her baby's father, whose genes are present in the young fetus and its placenta and which may pose a challenge to her immune system.[5] [13] As the theory is gaining support,[14] researchers are increasingly recognizing the importance of a woman's continued exposure to her partner's semen as early as several years before conception. One study published in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology involved several hundreds of women and found that "women with a short period of cohabitation (less than 4 months) who used barrier methods for contraception had a substantially elevated risk for the development of pre-eclampsia compared with women with more than 12 months of cohabitation before conception."[15] The study was also statistically significant at a desired 99.6% confidence level.

Results from research conducted in the past two decades strongly suggest the importance of repeated exposure to the father's semen throughout the full length of the pregnancy due to the immune-modulating effects of key factors in semen.

Women with underlying inflammatory disorders such as chronic hypertension or autoimmune diseases would likely benefit from aggressive treatment of those conditions prior to conception, tamping down the overactive immune system. Diagnosis of thrombophilias can allow for the administration of blood thinners, which may minimize clotting and improve blood flow through the placenta, minimizing the number of preeclampsia cases which apparently result from placental infarction.

Magnesium sulphate

In some cases. women with preeclampsia or eclampsia can be stabilized temporarily with magnesium sulfate intravenously to forestall seizures while steroid injections are administered to promote fetal lung maturation. Magnesium sulfate as a possible treatment was considered at least as far back as 1955,[16] but only in recent years did its use in the UK replace the use of diazepam or phenytoin.[17] Evidence for the use of magnesium sulphate came from the international MAGPIE study.[18] When induced delivery needs to take place before 37 weeks gestation, it is accepted that there are additional risks to the baby from premature birth that will require additional monitoring and care.

Dietary and Nutritional Factors

Studies of protein/calorie supplementation have found no effect on preeclampsia rates, and dietary protein restriction does not appear to increase preeclampsia rates.[19]

Studies conducted on the effect of supplementation with antioxidants such as vitamin C and E found no change in pre-eclampsia rates.[20] However, Drs. Padayatty and Levine with the NIH criticized the studies for overlooking several key factors that would have been important to the success of the supplementation. Because plasma ascorbate concentrations were not reported, they were estimated from known data, and the placebo and treatment groups in the study probably had similar plasma and tissue ascorbate concentrations. Some of the smaller doses of 1 g per day would have had little effect on plasma or intracellular ascorbate concentrations,[21] so the studies should have been conducted with higher dosages of vitamin C in order for there to have been any beneficial effects.

Low levels of vitamin D may be a risk factor for preeclampsia,[22] and calcium supplementation in women with low-calcium diets found no change in preeclampsia rates but did find a decrease in the rate of severe preeclamptic complications.[23]

Aspirin Supplementation

Aspirin supplementation is still being evaluated as to dosage, timing, and population and may provide a slight preventative benefit in some women, however significant research has been done on aspirin and the results thus far are unimpressive.[24]


There is insufficient evidence to recommend either exercise[25] or bedrest[26] as preventative measures.

Immunological Tolerance

Research on the immunological basis for pre-eclampsia has indicated that continued exposure to a partner's semen has a strong protective effect against pre-eclampsia, largely due to the absorption of several immune modulating factors present in seminal fluid.[27] Studies also showed that long periods of sexual cohabitation with the same partner fathering a woman's child significantly decreased her chances of suffering pre-eclampsia.[15] Several other studies have since investigated the strongly decreased incidence of pre-eclampsia in women who had received blood transfusions from their partner, those with long, preceding histories of sex without barrier contraceptives, and in women who had been regularly performing oral sex,[28] with one study concluding that "induction of allogeneic tolerance to the paternal HLA molecules of the fetus may be crucial. Data collected strongly suggests that exposure, and especially oral exposure to soluble HLA from semen can lead to transplantation tolerance."[28]

Other studies have investigated the roles of semen in the female reproductive tracts of mice, showing that "insemination elicits inflammatory changes in female reproductive tissues,"[29] concluding that the changes "likely lead to immunological priming to paternal antigens or influence pregnancy outcomes." A similar series of studies confirmed the importance of immune modulation in female mice through the absorption of specific immune factors in semen, including TGF-Beta, lack of which is also being investigated as a cause of miscarriage in women and infertility in men.

According to the theory, pre-eclampsia is frequently caused by a failure of the mother's immune system to accept the fetus and placenta, which both contain "foreign" proteins from paternal genes. Regular exposure to the father's semen causes her immune system to develop tolerance to the paternal antigens, a process which is significantly supported by as many as 93 currently identified immune regulating factors in seminal fluid.[5] [13] Having already noted the importance of a woman's immunological tolerance to her baby's paternal genes, several Dutch reproductive biologists decided to take their research a step further. Consistent with the fact that human immune systems tolerate things better when they enter the body via the mouth, the Dutch researchers conducted a series of studies that confirmed a surprisingly strong correlation between a diminished incidence of pre-eclampsia and a woman's practice of oral sex, and noted that the protective effects were strongest if she swallowed her partner's semen. [30] The researchers concluded that while any exposure to a partner's semen during sexual activity appears to decrease a woman's chances for the various immunological disorders that can occur during pregnancy, immunological tolerance could be most quickly established through oral introduction and gastrointestinal absorption of semen.[30] Recognizing that some of the studies potentially included the presence of confounding factors, such as the likelihood that women who regularly perform oral sex and swallow semen engage in more frequent vaginal and anal intercourse, the researchers also noted that, either way, the data still overwhelmingly supports the main theory behind all their studies--that repeated exposure to semen establishes the maternal immunological tolerance necessary for a safe and successful pregnancy.

When reporting the findings of the research group mentioned above, New Scientist magazine thought it was worth mentioning that many of the members on the research team were women (including the lead author).

A team from the University of Adelaide has also investigated to see if men who have fathered pregnancies which have ended in miscarriage or pre-eclampsia had low seminal levels of critical immune modulating factors such as TGF-Beta. The team has found that certain men, dubbed "dangerous males," are several times more likely to father pregnancies that would end in either preeclampsia or miscarriage. [31] Among other things, most of the "dangerous males" seemed to lack sufficient levels of the seminal immune factors necessary to induce immunological tolerance in their partners.

If the theory of pre-eclampsia as a symptom of immune intolerance in some cases is officially accepted, women who suffer repeated pre-eclampsia, miscarriages, or In Vitro Fertilization failures could potentially be administered key immune factors such as TGF-beta along with the father's foreign proteins, possibly either orally, as a sublingual spray, or as a vaginal gel to be applied onto the vaginal wall before intercourse.[31]


  1. ^ a b c Drife JO, Magowan (eds). Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, chapter 39, pp 367-370. ISBN 0-7020-1775-2.
  2. ^ Robbins and Cotran, Pathological Basis of Disease, 7th ed.
  3. ^ Hjartardottir S, Leifsson BG, Geirsson RT, Steinthorsdottir V. (2004). "Paternity change and the recurrence risk in familial hypertensive disorder in pregnancy.". Hypertens Pregnancy 2004;23(2):219-25. PMID 15369654
  4. ^ Zhang J. (2007). "Partner change, birth interval and risk of pre-eclampsia: a paradoxical triangle.". Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007 Jul;21 Suppl 1:31-5 PMID 17593195
  5. ^ a b c Burne, Jerome. "Give Sperm a Fighting Chance", The Times, 2006-01-30. Retrieved on 2007-11-16. 
  6. ^ Moffett A, Hiby SE. (2007). "How does the maternal immune system contribute to the development of pre-eclampsia?". Placenta 2007 Apr;28 Suppl A:S51-6. PMID 17292469
  7. ^ "Immune system 'causes miscarriage'", BBC News, 2000-01-20. Retrieved on 2007-11-26. 
  8. ^ Courtney Reynolds, MD, William C. Mabie, MD, & Baha M. Sibai, MD (2006). Preeclampsia. Pregancy - Hypertensive Disorders. Armenian Medical Network. Retrieved on 2006-11-23.
  9. ^ Maynard S, Min J, Merchan J, Lim K, Li J, Mondal S, Libermann T, Morgan J, Sellke F, Stillman I, Epstein F, Sukhatme V, Karumanchi S (2003). "Excess placental soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1) may contribute to endothelial dysfunction, hypertension, and proteinuria in preeclampsia.". J Clin Invest 111 (5): 649-58. PMID 12618519.
  10. ^ Venkatesha, S; Toporsian M, Lam C, Hanai J, Mammoto T, Kim YM, Bdolah Y, Lim KH, Yuan HT, Libermann TA, Stillman IE, Roberts D, D'Amore PA, Epstein FH, Sellke FW, Romero R, Sukhatme VP, Letarte M, Karumanchi SA. (2006). "Soluble endoglin contributes to the pathogenesis of preeclampsia". Nat Med 12 (6): 642-9. PMID 16751767.
  11. ^ Preeclampsia-Eclampsia. Diagnosis and management of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Armenian Medical Network (2003). Retrieved on 2005-11-23.
  12. ^ Douglas K, Redman C (1994). "Eclampsia in the United Kingdom". BMJ 309 (6966): 1395-400. PMID 7819845.
  13. ^ a b "Sex Primes Women for Sperm", BBC News, 2002-02-06. Retrieved on 2007-11-19. 
  14. ^ Leslie L. Waite (2002). "Pre-eclampsia, an Implantation Disorder". Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders 3 (2): 151-158.
  15. ^ a b Einarsson, Jon I. MD; Sangi-Haghpeykar, Haleh PhD; Gardner, Michael O. MD, MPH (2003). "Sperm exposure and development of preeclampsia". Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 188 (5): 1241-1243.
  16. ^ PRITCHARD J (1955). "The use of the magnesium ion in the management of eclamptogenic toxemias". Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics 100 (2): 131-40. PMID 13238166.
  17. ^ Compare descriptions in 1977 between a British and American paper.
    * Hibbard B, Rosen M (1977). "The management of severe pre-eclampsia and eclampsia". British journal of anaesthesia 49 (1): 3-9. PMID 831744.
    * Andersen W, Harbert G (1977). "Conservative management of pre-eclamptic and eclamptic patients: a re-evaluation". Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 129 (3): 260-7. PMID 900196.
  18. ^ Frayling, Frayling (2004). "The Magpie Trial follow up study: outcome after discharge from hospital for women and children recruited to a trial comparing magnesium sulphate with placebo for pre-eclampsia [ISRCTN86938761]" 4 (1): 5. PMID 15113445.
  19. ^ Kramer M, Kakuma R (2003). "Energy and protein intake in pregnancy.". Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4): CD000032. PMID 14583907.
  20. ^ Rumbold A, Crowther C, Haslam R, Dekker G, Robinson J (2006). "Vitamins C and E and the risks of preeclampsia and perinatal complications.". N Engl J Med 354 (17): 1796-806. PMID 16641396.
  21. ^ Padayatty SJ, Levine M. (2006). "Vitamin C and E and the Prevention of Preeclampsia - Letter" (PDF). NEJM 355 (10): 1065-1066.
  22. ^ Bodnar LM, Catov JM, Simhan HN, Holick MF, Powers RW, Roberts JM (2007). "Maternal vitamin D deficiency increases the risk of preeclampsia". J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 92 (9): 3517–22. doi:10.1210/jc.2007-0718. PMID 17535985.
  23. ^ Villar J, Abdel-Aleem H, Merialdi M, Mathai M, Ali M, Zavaleta N, Purwar M, Hofmeyr J, Nguyen T, Campódonico L, Landoulsi S, Carroli G, Lindheimer M (2006). "World Health Organization randomized trial of calcium supplementation among low calcium intake pregnant women.". Am J Obstet Gynecol 194 (3): 639-49. PMID 16522392.
  24. ^ Duley L, Henderson-Smart D, Knight M, King J (2004). "Antiplatelet agents for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications.". Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1): CD004659. PMID 14974075.
  25. ^ Meher S, Duley L (Apr 19 2006). "Exercise or other physical activity for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications.". Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2): CD005942. PMID 16625645.
  26. ^ Meher S, Duley L (Apr 19 2006). "Rest during pregnancy for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications in women with normal blood pressure.". Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2): CD005939. PMID 16625644.
  27. ^ Sarah Robertson. Research Goals.
  28. ^ a b Koelman CA, Coumans AB, Nijman HW, Doxiadis II, Dekker GA, Claas FH (2000). "Correlation between oral sex and a low incidence of preeclampsia: a role for soluble HLA in seminal fluid?". J. Reprod. Immunol. 46 (2): 155–66. PMID 10706945.
  29. ^ Martina Johansson, John J Bromfield, Melinda J Jasper, and Sarah A Robertson (2004). "Semen activates the female immune response during early pregnancy in mice". Journal of Immunology 112 (2): 290-300.
  30. ^ a b Fox, Douglas. "Gentle Persuasion", The New Scientist, 2002-02-09. Retrieved on 2007-06-17. 
  31. ^ a b Sarah A. Robertson, John J. Bromfield, and Kelton P. Tremellen (2003). "Seminal ‘priming’ for protection from pre-eclampsia—a unifying hypothesis". Journal of Reproductive Immunology 59 (2): 253-265.
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Pre-eclampsia". A list of authors is available in Wikipedia.
Your browser is not current. Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 does not support some functions on Chemie.DE